|
Meridian flip issue
Yes. So that leads to the next statement: As I've said before the master is likely to be abandoned so I'll patch bugs in the beta and release-3.16 only.
Yes. So that leads to the next statement: As I've said before the master is likely to be abandoned so I'll patch bugs in the beta and release-3.16 only.
|
By
Howard Dutton
· #30869
·
|
|
Meridian flip issue
And make sure the E/W Meridian Limits overlap. Otherwise there is no valid goto target (to this same RA/Dec) for the automatic flip, and so it'll throw the Meridian Limit error instead. And make sure
And make sure the E/W Meridian Limits overlap. Otherwise there is no valid goto target (to this same RA/Dec) for the automatic flip, and so it'll throw the Meridian Limit error instead. And make sure
|
By
Howard Dutton
· #30865
·
|
|
Showcase - The Micro Scope.
It's an impressive effort at integrating everything, well documented too.
It's an impressive effort at integrating everything, well documented too.
|
By
Howard Dutton
· #30850
·
|
|
3.16 vs 4.20
The yellow highlights show the menu bar item where you pull up the BOM and export it to see in Excel...
The yellow highlights show the menu bar item where you pull up the BOM and export it to see in Excel...
|
By
Howard Dutton
· #30754
·
|
|
3.16 vs 4.20
The schematic and BOM have the exact part. EasyEDA just doesn't make it easy to find, they give you an cut down BOM unless you dig a little. It's 2K don't use 5 or 10K. Some have soldered their own fr
The schematic and BOM have the exact part. EasyEDA just doesn't make it easy to find, they give you an cut down BOM unless you dig a little. It's 2K don't use 5 or 10K. Some have soldered their own fr
|
By
Howard Dutton
· #30753
·
|
|
3.16 vs 4.20
... this is exactly why I asked.
... this is exactly why I asked.
|
By
Howard Dutton
· #30746
·
|
|
3.16 vs 4.20
Lol, no perhaps. Two of the input only pins used for the ESP32 ST4 port have no internal pullups. So if nothing is connected to an ST4 port you can kind of get away with ON_PULLUP with other hardware.
Lol, no perhaps. Two of the input only pins used for the ESP32 ST4 port have no internal pullups. So if nothing is connected to an ST4 port you can kind of get away with ON_PULLUP with other hardware.
|
By
Howard Dutton
· #30745
·
Edited
|
|
3.16 vs 4.20
Check the resistor array, etc.
Check the resistor array, etc.
|
By
Howard Dutton
· #30744
·
|
|
3.16 vs 4.20
You likely have a hardware problem of some sort with the ST4 port.
You likely have a hardware problem of some sort with the ST4 port.
|
By
Howard Dutton
· #30742
·
|
|
3.16 vs 4.20
I was typing when you sent it.
I was typing when you sent it.
|
By
Howard Dutton
· #30736
·
|
|
3.16 vs 4.20
Mental hiccup, it's in OnStep.ino
Mental hiccup, it's in OnStep.ino
|
By
Howard Dutton
· #30735
·
|
|
3.16 vs 4.20
The one, likely, at 192.168.0.1 That doesn't matter, turn it off.
The one, likely, at 192.168.0.1 That doesn't matter, turn it off.
|
By
Howard Dutton
· #30734
·
|
|
3.16 vs 4.20
If you open up the website you can guide from there too, does e/w work there? If the ST4 port is active, disable it in Config.h There is debug mode too, might be helpful (or not.) That option is in Co
If you open up the website you can guide from there too, does e/w work there? If the ST4 port is active, disable it in Config.h There is debug mode too, might be helpful (or not.) That option is in Co
|
By
Howard Dutton
· #30732
·
|
|
New CGE Pro Conversion
#celestron
The Teensy4.0 is used with the MiniPCB2 since it is socket compatible and faster than the Teensy3.2 for ~ the same money. The T4.0 speed is massive overkill for our application, but no harm in that. A
The Teensy4.0 is used with the MiniPCB2 since it is socket compatible and faster than the Teensy3.2 for ~ the same money. The T4.0 speed is massive overkill for our application, but no harm in that. A
|
By
Howard Dutton
· #30729
·
|
|
3.16 vs 4.20
1. Confirm you are running the latest beta branch. If not, fix that and test again to confirm the problem is still there. 2. Provide me with your Config.h file. 3. Provide more detail of the EXACT ste
1. Confirm you are running the latest beta branch. If not, fix that and test again to confirm the problem is still there. 2. Provide me with your Config.h file. 3. Provide more detail of the EXACT ste
|
By
Howard Dutton
· #30726
·
|
|
3.16 vs 4.20
Not that I recall. The most recent OnStep release is still release-3.16 The beta branch is the most up to date of the 4.x series. What is an "exact park position"? OnStep doesn't park at arbitrary exa
Not that I recall. The most recent OnStep release is still release-3.16 The beta branch is the most up to date of the 4.x series. What is an "exact park position"? OnStep doesn't park at arbitrary exa
|
By
Howard Dutton
· #30723
·
|
|
Advanced configuration control
So I take it there is no evidence it doesn't work properly, just you couldn't setup exactly as before. I say the novice who doesn't want to go through all the hoops to upload OnStep the traditional wa
So I take it there is no evidence it doesn't work properly, just you couldn't setup exactly as before. I say the novice who doesn't want to go through all the hoops to upload OnStep the traditional wa
|
By
Howard Dutton
· #30709
·
|
|
Advanced configuration control
I say if the main axes are LV8729 make them all LV8729. Otherwise TMC2130's in the focuser/rotator positions and either TMC2130's or 5160's in Axis1/2.
I say if the main axes are LV8729 make them all LV8729. Otherwise TMC2130's in the focuser/rotator positions and either TMC2130's or 5160's in Axis1/2.
|
By
Howard Dutton
· #30708
·
|
|
Advanced configuration control
The are different drivers so, no that part wouldn't work. It would be good to hear if this is a bug, the description is just too vague for me to know. Do you mean you couldn't optimize as well or it j
The are different drivers so, no that part wouldn't work. It would be good to hear if this is a bug, the description is just too vague for me to know. Do you mean you couldn't optimize as well or it j
|
By
Howard Dutton
· #30705
·
|
|
Onstep 4.23 beta problem
Not maybe, very much on purpose. OTA level (pointing at the horizon) and North. That applies to all users, even in southern latitudes. If you need/want to change it, add a line in Config.h to #define
Not maybe, very much on purpose. OTA level (pointing at the horizon) and North. That applies to all users, even in southern latitudes. If you need/want to change it, add a line in Config.h to #define
|
By
Howard Dutton
· #30661
·
|